Advertisers or people? Debate over who's really harmed by Google 'monopoly'

 

Google has long defended itself against charges of monopoly by stressing that its products are free and that no one has to use them.

And it's avoided tough government scrutiny for years based in part on the idea that people searching the internet are not Google's true customers.

We're its product. Advertisers are its real customers. That complicates the question of who, if anyone, is hurt by Google's dominance in selling ads off the world's search queries and through its array of affiliated businesses, from its Android phone software to its YouTube video platform and digital maps.

The US Justice Department's new antitrust lawsuit against Google argues that both advertisers and regular people are harmed by the tech giant's position as the unchallenged gateway to the internet for billions of users worldwide."

As a consequence, countless advertisers must pay a toll to Google's search advertising and general search text advertising monopolies," the government wrote in Tuesday's landmark complaint, which asks a federal court to intervene to protect competition.

Read Complete Article


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Infinix Smart 2 review: 'Value for money' smartphone with tall 18:9 screen

Year in review: From OnePlus to Asus, best midrange flagship phones of 2019

OnePlus 8 review: Meaningful innovations elevate experience, justify price